The great Greenbuild whirlwind – Day 3

 

Day 3 : Thursday, November 18

Having two days to warm up, my Greenbuild momentum had gained full force going into a day of four educational sessions, a meeting with sustainable design leaders from across the country, and the famous Thursday night party.

Continuing on the theme of “big picture” sustainability, I attended a second session led by Sera Architects on Portland Eco-Districts, a concept that looks at infrastructure and planning, green economic development, and job creation. Speaking with representatives from the Portland Development Commission, Lloyd Transportation Management Association, and the Portland Sustainability Institute, the team outlined how they had developed a process and tools for implementing Eco-Districts, and were beta-testing five existing neighborhoods within the city, each of which has differing conditions. Building upon the existing context, the main concerns were increasing pedestrian traffic, localizing energy and water services, encouraging resident engagement in the neighborhood, and creating an economically viable community. The team proposes a 20-minute neighborhood – where one could walk a maximum of 20 minutes to access all services. Building synergies was also emphasized – an office building adjacent to a residential building could potentially share energy due to their different load schedules.

The lunchtime session was the annual BuildingGreen’s “Top 10 Green Products,” which included Ornilux Bird-Safe glass (which we used at the Center for Global Conservation, and hopefully helped raise the general issue of bird-safe buildings).

Sherwood Institute's map of water use by state

I also attended a presentation session by Sherwood Design Engineers and Atelier Ten on the relationship of carbon (and energy) to water. Besides the more commonly known facts, such as the vast quantities of water used in cooling towers, I was astounded to discover the “water intensity” of generating bio-fuels, calling into question the real viability of such an approach, as well as the potentially dire consequences, such as shortages for human consumption and food production. Atelier Ten also participated in a panel on advanced energy modeling, along with the New Buildings Institute’s Mark Frankel, who delved into the question of modeling occupant behavior – a very tricky science, but important since occupant behavior makes the difference between an efficient green building and a wasteful one.

The evening began with a gathering of the Architecture and Design Sustainable Design Leaders, where several of us shared unique initiatives we were working on – I presented our pre-and post-occupancy studies for Rockefeller Brothers Fund. A few of us continued the discussion at dinner where we debated other issues such as the controversial subject of certified wood. Finally, I headed for the final Greenbuild celebration, hosted by several companies including YRG, 7Group, and Fore Solutions.

The great Greenbuild whirlwind – Day 2

Day 2 : Wednesday, November 17

Wednesday marked the official opening of Greenbuild with an unusually political bent—keynote speaker Former Secretary of State General Colin Powell, who talked about leadership and the green economy, followed by a discussion by opposing married pundits James Carville and Mary Matalin.

Greenbuild provided several workshops including this on on LEED ND

I continued with my plan by participating in an interactive workshop on LEED for Neighborhood Development (ND). This year, the USGBC experimented with the format of educational sessions, some were workshops and some were “theater in the round” presentations The workshop focused on developing a disenfranchised Chicago neighborhood using principles of LEED ND. My table included several planners, one was tasked with developing the pro-forma and ensuring that our proposal would be profitable. While limited time precluded delving deeply into the subject, the case study illustrated the challenge of densifying and diversifying existing suburbs, especially in poor and crime-ridden areas. Retrofitting suburbs in this country is a challenge far greater than retrofitting buildings, and one that may be one of the more important issues for the future of the planet. 

My sessions rounded off with an interesting presentation by a northern California panel of architects and engineers on Net-Zero energy public schools, a challenging endeavor on limited budgets and standardized systems, where the role of the electrical engineer is critical to both reducing loads and designing the optimal PV system.

Then back to the Chicago Art Institute for a Buro-Happold/ Architect’s Newspaper event…

A snapshot of the great Greenbuild whirlwind – Day 1

 

Day 1: Tuesday, November 16

30,000 people! In spite of the gloomy economy these days, this year’s turnout at Chicago Greenbuild was greater than ever. More importantly, so was the content. After being disappointed at the quality of educational sessions over the past couple of years, I was pleasantly surprised to see that my feedback last year (and that of many others) was taken to heart by the USGBC. The sessions were generally at a higher level.

After several years trying to cram every component of the event into three days, I tried something more strategic; firstly, by arriving early to take in sessions at the International Forum; secondly, by focusing primarily on planning and infrastructure sessions; and thirdly, by seeking out interesting people to engage.

Greenbuild International Conference and Expo 2010 in Chicago

The highlight of the International Forum was a presentation by the design team of Sera Architects, Interface Engineering, and RWDI Consultants on the planning of Lira, the western capital of the UAE. Unlike Riyadh, Lira is a desert oasis inland from the Arabian Gulf and has almost no water. They emphasized the importance of proper climate analysis in generating an appropriate plan. Such considerations include the overlay of temperature, humidity, solar radiation, wind, diurnal variations, and thermal comfort in developing street orientation, building heights, shading, and landscape. It was interesting to note that in this climate orientation should be optimized to take advantage of cooling winds. Solar orientation is secondary, as shading devices can be added as required. Duncan Phillips of RWDI concluded by showing a unique outdoor thermal comfort map of the city that identified areas of comfort, moderate discomfort and intolerable circumstances. The designers surveyed residents about their comfort levels and overlaying their response with climate data as well as their clothing, activity, and time spent outdoors. This methodology allowed them to adjust the urban plan to optimize outdoor comfort through passive strategies to encourage a more vibrant and pedestrian urban fabric.

Tuesday also marked the first night of the Greenbuild parties. I first attended a Sage Glass party where I was taken to the top of the Willis Tower (formerly Sears Tower), where I stood on the new glass-bottomed floor—vertiginous yet exhilarating! I also learned more about their solar responsive glazing, which they expect to more competitively price in future. I ended the first day at the Turner Construction party at the Chicago Art Institute—a beautiful space full of the usual green suspects from New York, almost like I’d never left home.

Yes We Can!

In its 18th year, Canstruction NYC kicked off last Wednesday night at the World Financial Center. Competition was tough this year as 24 teams participated. We were happy to see some longtime competitors return to the stacking floor.

"Building Blocks Against Hunger" the FXFOWLE/WSP Flack + Kurtz entry for Canstruction 2010

Once again FXFOWLE and WSP Flack + Kurtz teamed on this year’s effort, but we took a completely different approach than last year’s “Canny Island.” Going for something a little more primordial we considered something that inspires many architects and engineers at a young age. Something that we can still appreciate as that which ignited an interest in designing and buildings—a toy modular building block with a friction locking interface that begins a lifetime of construction! Oh, those sleek finishes and those brilliant colors. That smooth resistance and slight snap as the pieces lock together. We assembled 7644 cans to canstruct eleven “Building Blocks Against Hunger.”

While over 100,000 cans were donated in in total from this year’s sculptures, a winning move in stocking City Harvest’s pantry,  the FXFOWLE/WSP Flack + Kurtz team unfortunately did not win any prizes. However, Bruce Fowle was honored with a trophy acknowledging FXFOWLE’s participation in the past 15 years of Canstruction. This year’s jurors’ favorite went to Thornton Tomasetti’s “BabushCan,” an interpretation of matroshka nesting dolls.

FXFOWLE Founding Principal Bruce Fowle with his award for 15 years participation in Canstruction

Founded in 1992 by Cheri C. Melillo, Canstruction events occur in over a hundred cities across the US, as well as internationally. The Canstructions will be on view at the World Financial Center daily from 10am–7pm until 5pm Monday November 22. Come take a look and bring a can or two to donate to City Harvest.

Trick or Treat Expo, Part 2

While the Shanghai Expo successfully showcased various countries and cultures, through carefully edited highlights, I doubt that many visitors departed appreciating how we could actually build healthier, more sustainable cities. Unfortunately the smaller pavilions extolling the virtues of green living, and the Expo’s tag-line “Better City, Better Life,” seemed comparatively under-attended. Rather than creating queues their entries seemed to repel visitors. Sprinkled amongst the international and corporate pavilions’ schizophrenic range of styles, the smaller educational depots looked like service buildings.

The big question remains. What will become of this newly reformed site as it becomes a new commercial and business district? Will it contribute to a “Better City?” The site, on facing banks of the Huangpu River, optimally sits at the crossroads of two subway lines downriver from the Bund. The housing (for 60,000 citizens) that once stood there has been razed. Infrastructure has been put in place. Maybe the longest lasting impact of the Expo will be the subway lines and airport that shuttled tourists (5.8 percent of visitors) to the Expo and local destinations. But will it live up to the legacy of the “green” expo?

The China Pavilion

The China Pavilon is slated to become a museum of Chinese history and culture. Photo by Gao Tian

Five of the larger buildings, such as the iconic China Pavilion, will remain. On a smaller level, contrary to initial reports that all the pavilions would be demolished, some of the pavilions are being auctioned. The Taiwan pavilion, for example, will continue its life in Hsinchu, Taiwan as an innovation and exposition center. Others may go to Chinese provinces that have ties with respective countries, although this has not been confirmed.

The Expo grounds provide a setting to interject a sustainable approach into a city that has been running full steam ahead for the past few years, and the government is steadily applying pressure to developers to utilize environmental measures in new buildings. Meanwhile, studios at nearby Tongji University’s College of Architecture and Urban Planning have been studying possibilities for the site, but only theoretically.

Expo site model at Tongji University

Students at Tongji University are studying possible futures for the Expo site.

Hopefully one of those rare moments will emerge when vision, commerce, and policy all align. As things go in China, whatever becomes of the site, we’re sure to see the results in a few years.

Trick or Treat Expo, Part 1

 

By James Way

Shanghai’s Expo 2010, which closed on Halloween, definitely had some architectural treats. We’ve all been inundated with Heatherwick’s U.K. pavilion, that luminescent porcupine. Really quite beautiful but the trick was to actually get into it. The queue kept me well beyond arms length…by about, oh, three hours! This recurring problem deterred me from many of the pavilions. The more opulent, the longer the line.

The U.K. Pavilion by Heatherwick Studio

The U.K. Pavilion by Heatherwick Studio. Photo by Gao Tian

Surprisingly, after only a 35 minute wait I entered the Danish Pavilion, which, in one word, rocked—formally (the product of Bjarke Ingels Group, Arup, and artist Jeppe Hein) and content-wise (contributions from  designers 2+1 Ideas Agency, director Martin de Thurah, and photographer Peter Funch). 

The Danish Pavilion by collaborators BIG, Arup, and 2+1 Ideas.

By October 30 the number of visitors matched the country’s population (5.55 million)—attracted by either the Little Mermaid sculpture or the chance to ride a bicycle down the pavilion’s circling ramp, which unfortunately closed after dark. Many less-populated countries boast similar claims as the Expo’s final attendance tally exceeded 73 million. The day I attended only a mere 415,300 people showed up, slightly more than the population of Oakland, CA. Many of these were repeat visitors though; one person I talked to had gone four times and had seen only a few of the pavilions.

The Little Mermaid scuplture and a visitor preparing to bicycle down the pavilion.

The Little Mermaid Sculpture on its first excursion from the harbour of Copenhagen (l). A visitor prepares to ride a bicycle down the pavilion's intertwining form (r).

On Saturday October 16, however, over one million people crowded the Expo, setting a daily record and surpassing attendance records established forty years ago at Osaka’s Expo. This number surpasses the populations of many of the U.S.’s larger mid-sized cities: Detroit, San Francisco (proper), Austin, and Indianapolis, to name a few. I can imagine the lines and waiting. I heard that people crowded the entrance gates to get into the proper lines before even entering the Expo grounds. Fortunately things didn’t disintegrate into Altamont proportion chaos.

But this excessive crowding is part of our future. A recent issue of Foreign Policy confirms that “half the world’s population is now urban” and continuing to congregate in urban centers, like Shanghai’s 19,213,200 people have. Richard Dobbs, in his article “Megacities,” points out that “China will need 40 billion square meters of combined residential and commercial floor space over the next 20 years — equivalent to adding one New York every two years.” While construction thrives in Shanghai (more construction cranes than I could keep track of), I wonder if the Expo’s theme “Better City, Better Life” will have any impact. This indeed will be the trick.

Mourning the Loss of the SunChips Bag

 

Given the vast amount of trash that continues to pour into our landfills and coagulate in the Pacific Ocean each day, the recent backlash against the SunChips eco-friendly bag is a sad reflection on American consumers. Made by Frito-Lay and introduced to US shoppers earlier this year,  the revolutionary SunChips bags are made from a plant-based material that biodegrades quickly in landfills (in about 14 weeks, according to the company’s website), unlike traditional foil-lined snack chip bags which do not break down at all.

Given the considerable amount of snacking Americans do each day, and the extraordinary amount of packaging waste that it leads to, Frito-Lay’s SunChips bag had the potential to have a real impact our environment by significantly reducing landfill waste. Check out the “See for your self” video depicting the bag’s cycle of decomposition on the company website.

Unfortunately, all the SunChips eco-friendly bag did was expose our society’s pettiness. After only a few months on the shelves, Frito-Lay faced an abundance of criticism and public outcry, and is reverting back to its original packaging for all but its original flavor SunChips – all because of a deluge of inane complaints about the bags being too loud

See for yourself in this YouTube video.

Okay, I admit, the bag is loud, but does that really prevent folks from enjoying the chips? And is the noise really enough to justify hundreds of negative YouTube videos, feature stories on nationally-televised morning news programs, and a 50,000+ member anti-SunChips FaceBook group likening the bag’s noise to a 747 taking off?

Really people? Opening this bag is so hard on the ears that the minor annoyance overrides a significant environmental benefit? You know we’ve become a truly spoiled and selfish society when a little crinkling is enough to garner this much negative attention. I say, “Get over it!” If the noise is too hard for you to take, how ‘bout just emptying the chips into a bowl? Is that kind of inconvenience really too much to suffer for the good of the planet? Apparently so –according to SymphonyIRI Group, the market research specialist, SunChips have dropped 11 percent since the introduction of the eco-friendly bag.

Alas, I can only hope that Frito-Lay and other chip-makers head back to the drawing board and come up with a better biodegradable bag option – one that the “Me first, Earth later” snackers will accept. In the meantime, if shoppers are worried so much about noise, perhaps they should try leaving their cell phones at home. Now THAT would lead to a better shopping experience.

Innovation Conference, Part III

  

Integration + Inspiration + Intelligence = Innovation 

The final presentation of the McGraw Hill Innovation Conference highlighted the new Manitoba Hydro Headquarters in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Bruce Kuwabara of KPMB Architects and Thomas Auer of Transsolar Climate Engineers guided the audience through the project’s development and demonstrated the fundamental importance of integration in realizing sustainable innovation. 

Thomas Auer raised the issue of how green buildings are architecturally expressed. He likened the current state of popular green building language to a Hummer with solar panels and wind turbine on the roof, and the requisite bike rack attached to the rear. This raises an important question that sustainable designers have been struggling with for some time: how should a green building express its greenness? 

Diagram of Manitoba Hydro Headquarters by KPMB Architects and Transsolar

In an era when sustainability both drives and is driven by marketing, the obvious answer would be “as evidently as possible.” But for this para-public project, seemingly less influenced by market forces, the unequivocal response by the architect and engineer was “not unless it makes sense.” Much as the Modernists rejected applied ornament, Kuwabara and Auer cast off green “bling” in favor of intelligent integrated design, where extensive environmental analysis informs proposed design solutions. 

Designing in a climate like Winnipeg’s is no small feat. The weather ranges from -35 C in the winter to +35 C in the summer. Humid and mosquito-ridden summers clash with winters that bring harsh cold winds. The one positive aspect is that Winnipeg, Auer noted, is the sunniest northern city, particularly on cold winter days. 

Kuwabara explained the organizational context of the project, including the dedication of all parties to engage in an integrated design process. First, the client committed to relocating multiple suburban offices to a centralized urban location in downtown Winnipeg, reflecting a shift of values towards urban revitalization and public transportation. Then, the team established its main goals in a Project Charter. 

KPMB Architects and Transsolar's facade system for Manitoba Hydro Headquarters

Site and program met climate and culture to inform and inspire the process. What emerged is an office building that incorporates intelligent and responsive passive design solutions coupled with select energy technologies. Taking advantage of the sun and wind, the designers oriented the A-shaped building’s narrow floor plates to rely on solar and daylight harvesting. Operable double wall technology allows 100% fresh air, preconditioned by south-facing winter gardens. A solar chimney exhausts or recovers heat, and geothermal wells provide radiant heating and cooling. A water feature in the atrium made from Mylar ribbons, the most unique element, humidifies winter air and dehumidifies moist summer air. 

For such an extreme climate, the results are remarkable: a 65% energy reduction in performance compared to the Canadian Energy Code. 

Following the lecture, two questions remained unresolved. Why, in a climate with abundant sun and low solar angles, were no Building Integrated Photovoltaics used? And why, at the windiest intersection in the windiest city in Canada, were there no wind turbines? For a power company headquarters, incorporating these technologies would make sense. Auer responded that the team undertook the analysis, but the energy output and payback was insufficient to make it worthwhile. 

I gathered from the presentation that there is no prescriptive manner in which a building should express its sustainability. In some instances it may be overt, in others more subtle and perhaps not even visual, such as simply providing high quality air. It is important that to be truly sustainable, the building reveals the thought and analysis invested in responding to its climate, context, and occupants, and that ultimately – it is acting in symbiosis with them.

Innovation Conference, Part II




architizer