
By James Way
Tattfoo Tan, a social activist/artist practicing in Staten Island, works with the sustainability movement but combines an ironic approach to art history while embracing performance. One of several works on display is Black Gold, a parody of a 1961 work by Piero Manzoni (I’ll leave it to you to follow the link and find it), presents the efforts of composting taken to an artistic and economic extreme. Tan bottled his “secret recipe” compost and is selling it at the going rate for gold, although his website offers recession pricing. But don’t let this fool you; the artist is not full of sh*t when it comes to his mission: greening urban lifestyles.

Tafftoo Tan demonstrates compost materials and methods.
Last week the artist, included in Irrelevant: Local Emerging Asian Artists Who Don’t Make Work About Being Asian, at the Arario Gallery in Chelsea, held a composting workshop on how to produce some of the finest, most fertile compost around. One of the missing components in many compost bins are worms: red worms, commonly known as red wrigglers, scientifically known as eisenia fetida. “Don’t forget the worms,” he warned. “They eat, have sex, reproduce, and poop all day. They’re great!” Worms can provide compost so fertile that some of your composting material may actually begin growing. He also warned against drowning or suffocating the worms. The artist’s website, under the Black Gold link, provides a basic overview on how to begin.
Thursday July 22 at 8pm at the Arario Gallery he will provide an urban gardening workshop and round table discussion.
If you don’t want to think about death right now you should stop reading and move on to one of our other Blog posts. Well…maybe not the one about birds colliding into buildings…and not the one with the eco-coffin, but any of the others.

Greensprings Natural Cemetery, Newfield, NY (photo courtesy of Greensprings)
If you’ve ever been involved in planning a funeral you understand how surreal the whole process can be. No, not like an episode of Six Feet Under, but…strange. You’re expected to make important decisions during a time of extreme emotional duress, and even if you’re planning far in advance it can become overwhelming.
There are many aspects to consider and, like everything else, that includes sustainability practices. In regard to “deathcare” (yes, that’s the lingo), what are green(er) options? Although I had some awareness of this subject, I had no idea how vast and complicated it is, and defining “green” is not so easy. So, I did some basic research and here are a few thoughts:
Donate your body to a medical school. It will be used for training—truly the ultimate recycling. My excitement faded about this after finding out that it’s not as easy as it sounds since certain conditions (organ donation, disease…) may result in “non-acceptance.” Just like an exclusive club or admission to Harvard, I have a feeling that I just might not make the cut. Also, any unused remains must still be disposed of in the future.
Traditional cremation in a green facility. Since one of the major issues with burials is the actual physical space required, cremation seems like a green option. It’s been around for thousands of years. The cremains (more lingo) take little space to bury or store in a container made from recycled materials, or they can be scattered. It does, however, take energy to burn a body although the data that I found was very inconsistent (and often misleading) as to how much energy is actually required. Also, new crematories use half as much energy as older ones. Some even use the energy from the burning process to power their facilities. Furthermore, it appears that solar cremation is being developed. There can be toxic emissions from the fuels being used or from body implants such as dental fillings (yes, I have some) or breast implants (no, I don’t). Some crematories address this by using special multi-step filtration systems to reduce emissions and carbon offsets can also be purchased.
New technologies in lieu of cremation. If you’re looking for something more cutting-edge, there are new eco-friendly technologies: “promession” is a freeze-drying technique involving liquid nitrogen, and there is something called “bio-cremation” that speeds up natural decomposition by using water and an alkali solution. These seem very Doctor Who-ish to me, and I can’t imagine my loved ones learning that I had chosen one of these.
Burial in a memorial reef. OK…this one surprised me. If you do decide on cremation (and you love the ocean), you can have your cremains placed in a “memorial reef,” which is an artificial reef created to replicate a natural marine environment. These reefs, which allow coral and microorganisms to settle on and grow, were developed to offset the deterioration and loss of natural reefs. They are made from environmentally-friendly materials. The first artificial reefs were developed in the late 1980s in the Florida Keys, and the first memorial reef was created in 1998. There are memorial reef projects in Florida, South Carolina, and New Jersey.

A memorial reef (photo courtesy of Eternal Reefs, Inc.)
Green in-ground burial. If you want something more traditional that doesn’t involve embalming (it’s not required by law), try burial in a biodegradable shroud in a shallow grave (too deep and it impedes decomposition) without a marker. Most cemeteries, however, do not allow this type of burial. Although caskets are not required (you can actually rent one for a funeral), a steel or concrete vault is a necessity in most cemeteries to prevent collapse or sinking of the grave. If you live in a rural area, it may be possible to do all of this on your land although laws and regulations vary—but you might want to start on this now since it can take a long time if approvals are required. There are green cemeteries that allow this type of burial and some put special emphasis on the preservation of the land as open space for future generations.
I’ve certainly learned a lot, but I’m not sure about my plans. Decisions about deathcare depend on a variety of factors including religion and spirituality, customs, consideration of family and friends, practicality, and aesthetics, so it doesn’t seem possible to make decisions based solely on sustainability. It does, however, show that sustainability can be a consideration.
For more information: http://www.greenburialcouncil.com/
Recently, Glenn Phillips, Executive Director of the New York City Audubon Society, lectured on bird-safe buildings, a near and dear subject to the firm, yet one that is off the radar for most architects and developers.
According to Phillips, buildings kill at least 100 million birds annually in the US. In fact, buildings are the second largest contributor to bird deaths after habitat loss. Beyond cruelty to animals, this issue has greater impacts by upsetting the delicate ecological balance because birds contribute to pollination, seed distribution, and insect control. Phillips elaborated that bird mortalities result from complex interrelationships between migratory patterns and corridors, flight height and speed, time of day, biological navigation mechanisms, building height, placement of vegetation, glazing properties, and building lighting strategies.
Birds migrate as far as 14,000 miles from the Arctic to the Caribbean and South America, and many flights are continuous without any refueling stops—for example, Blackpoll Warblers undertake a 72-hour non-stop flight. Flight speeds are not slow; over 90% of migratory species fly between 15-45 mph. The majority fly at heights of 50-2000 feet, well within building height ranges. Given that the east coast—one of the most densely developed regions in the world—is a major migration corridor, the overlay of flight patterns with tall buildings creates a high probability for collisions.